PHILIPSBURG:— In 1953, one year prior to the adoption of the Kingdom Charter, the United Nations, via Resolution 747 (VIII), expressed to the Netherlands “its confidence that, as a result of the negotiations (with the former Netherlands Antilles), a new status will be attained by the Netherlands Antilles and Surinam representing a full measure of self-government in fulfillment of the objectives set forth in Chapter XI of the (UN) Charter.” In 1954, the Netherlands adopted the very restrictive Kingdom Charter in contravention to the advice given by the United Nations Fourth Committee the previous year. In 1955, the United Nations rejected the Kingdom Charter by refusing to declare that the islands of the former Netherlands Antilles had attained a full measure of self-governance, a right to self-determination and that Chapter XI no longer applied. According to Dr. Hillebrink, author of The Right to Self-Determination and Post-Colonial Governance: The Case of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba, the United Nations’ refusal to make the three aforementioned statements regarding the full measure of self-governance, a right to self-determination, and the application of Chapter XI, was based on the restrictive articles of the Kingdom Charter namely Articles 44, 50, 51, as well as, the appointed governor. Bear in mind that in 1953 and 1954 respectively, the United Nations was able to declare that Puerto Rico and Greenland had attained a full measure of self-governance and a right to self-determination. Somehow in 1955, the United Nations was not able to make those exact statements for the former Netherland Antilles in UN Resolution 945 (X).
Pro Soualiga Foundation
